

Hail, Caesar!
Lights. Camera. Abduction.
When a Hollywood star mysteriously disappears in the middle of filming, the studio sends their fixer to get him back.
Runtime
1h 46m
Language
EN
Budget
$22M
Revenue
$63.6M
Cast
Faces behind the story

Josh Brolin
Eddie Mannix

George Clooney
Baird Whitlock

Alden Ehrenreich
Hobie Doyle

Ralph Fiennes
Laurence Laurentz

Scarlett Johansson
DeeAnna Moran
Geser ke samping untuk melihat lainnya.
Gallery
Frames that sell the world






Reviews
Audience signals
There’s a scene halfway through the film when Hobie Doyle (Alden Ehrenreich), a Western B-movie star, is cast in a fancy melodrama helmed by Laurence Laurentz (Ralph Fiennes). Doyle is hopelessly out of his element, hobbling about in his new suit–the switch was the studio’s idea in an effort to broaden Doyle’s appeal, much to Laurentz’s dismay. It’s not long before the two engage in a back-and-forth, Laurentz trying to get Doyle to pronounce “Would that it ‘twere so simple”, and Doyle trying desperately to appease Laurentz. After a lengthy exchange, both are left exacerbated. Much later in the film, we catch a glimpse of the final version, where Doyle and Laurentz compromise with a much simpler: “It’s…complicated.” Complicated is exactly what’s at the heart of this situation. Laurentz’s increasing frustration with this obvious miscast and Doyle’s confusion may serve to fuel the slapstick comedy on exhibit, yet this scene alludes to so much more. It’s the inner mechanics of Hollywood, where directors are mere technicians and actors are props, all to be assigned and managed. It’s the clashing of proud classical Hollywood traditions of entertainment and escapism with the dreaded rise of message films and sophisticated art. It’s the contradictory nature of unfettered creativity with capitalism and consumerism, where compromise–and perhaps communism–seems to be the only way out. This is just one slice of the screwball nature that is the Coen Brothers’ latest comedy, Hail, Caesar! There’s also a kidnapped Roman soldier, Baird Whitlock (George Clooney at his dimmest and greatest), a handsome sailor (Channing Tatum) and a beautiful mermaid (Scarlett Johansson). All opportunities–that the Coens gladly take–to simultaneously demonstrate the power and influence of cinema, while mocking its sense of self-importance. Each scene is allowed to play out, Channing Tatum and his homoerotic musical number or Scarlett Johansson’s hypnotizing aquatic acrobatics. It’s not only an homage films of the Golden Era, but a demonstration of the mechanics that make film such an appealing medium. The Coen Brothers have a firm grasp on the allure behind each piece, using the acting, staging and costumes to propel Hail, Caesar! forward. It’s a simple concept–use filmmaking techniques to advance a theme and narrative, but by prioritizing these lengthy sequences over traditional narrative pacing or dialogue, the Coen Brothers give room for these fundamental concepts to breathe and thrive. It’s all threaded together through Josh Brolin’s character, Eddie Mannix, studio fixer. And there’s a lot that needs fixing: a pregnant star, a discontent director, communism, threat from the future–the usual. It’s a packed schedule, and the film follows suit with a similarly hectic pacing. An array of symbols, innuendos and subversions are thrown at the viewer: Capital Studios butting with Das Kapital, Mannix being offered a role at Lockheed where they tout a more stable industry– weapon-making, or Whitlock staring at the audience as he addresses God. It borders on bombastic, but there’s just too much wit, and heart, here to discredit any of the ideas presented–fleshed out or not. Hail, Caesar! doesn’t break new ground in the increasingly crowded sub-genre of Hollywood-on-Hollywood, but it hits a Goldilocks concoction between inside baseball cynicism and endearing love letter. Though all these antics, the Coen Brothers argue, quite convincingly, that everything in film matters, while also making a case for the futility and hollowness of anything produced on the grounds of Hollywood. So is this a nihilistic shrug at our attempt at defining and contextualizing or a fierce exhibition of the inherent power of Hollywood where life imitates art? Well, as Doyle would try to tell you, “Would that it ‘twere so simple.”
Recommendations
Films that continue this mood and momentum.

Palmetto
1998 / Crime, Mystery

Nancy Drew
2007 / Family, Adventure

Who's Harry Crumb?
1989 / Comedy, Crime

Who Framed Roger Rabbit
1988 / Fantasy, Animation

The Lost City
2022 / Action, Adventure

That Darn Cat!
1965 / Family, Crime

Zero Effect
1998 / Comedy, Crime

After the Fox
1966 / Crime, Comedy

Dog Gone
2008 / Comedy, Family

Nine Lives
2016 / Fantasy, Comedy

The Freshman
1990 / Comedy, Crime

Sherlock Jr.
1924 / Action, Comedy

Problem Child
1990 / Comedy, Family

Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid
1982 / Comedy, Mystery

Family Plot
1976 / Comedy, Crime

See How They Run
2022 / Mystery, Comedy

Baby's Day Out
1994 / Comedy, Adventure

Scooby-Doo
2002 / Mystery, Adventure

The Late Show
1977 / Mystery, Crime

Chip 'n Dale: Rescue Rangers
2022 / Animation, Family
Geser ke samping untuk melihat lainnya.
Similar Movies
Adjacent stories from the same cinematic neighborhood.

The Ring
2002 / Horror, Mystery

Rear Window
1954 / Thriller, Mystery

The Man Who Knew Too Much
1956 / Thriller, Mystery

Monsters, Inc.
2001 / Animation, Comedy

Grease
1978 / Romance, Comedy

Changing Skins
1997 / Comedy

Gentlemen Prefer Blondes
1953 / Comedy, Romance

M*A*S*H
1970 / Comedy, Drama

10 Items or Less
2006 / Comedy, Drama

Nobody Will Laugh
1966 / Drama, Comedy

Une petite fille dans les tournesols
1984 / Drama, TV Movie

Le bahut va craquer
1981 / Comedy

Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down!
1990 / Comedy, Romance

In the Mouth of Madness
1995 / Horror, Mystery

Pleasantville
1998 / Fantasy, Comedy

Toscana
2022 / Comedy

Kit & Co.
1974 / Adventure, Western

Identity
2003 / Mystery, Thriller

The Electrical Life of Louis Wain
2021 / Drama, History

Screen Test
2023 / Comedy
Geser ke samping untuk melihat lainnya.









